On April 10, a photograph of a black hole, the first ever taken, went viral. That was no surprise. But a second photo went viral, too—one of a woman named Dr. Katie Bouman, who was part of the team that captured the image, and that one wasn’t planned.
The picture, which Bouman posted to her own Facebook account, shows her smiling almost in disbelief as the first image of the cosmic phenomenon was rendered on the computer screen in front of her. It’s an amazing picture that captures true wonder.
An MIT account for their largest research lab, Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Lab, tweeted the image, writing, “Here’s the moment when the first black hole image was processed, from the eyes of researcher Katie Bouman.”
Here's the moment when the first black hole image was processed, from the eyes of researcher Katie Bouman. #EHTBlackHole #BlackHoleDay #BlackHole (v/@dfbarajas) pic.twitter.com/n0ZnIoeG1d
— MIT CSAIL (@MIT_CSAIL) April 10, 2019
The same account had also posted a tweet about Bouman and the project Wednesday morning.
3 years ago MIT grad student Katie Bouman led the creation of a new algorithm to produce the first-ever image of a black hole.
Today, that image was released.
More info: https://t.co/WITAL1omGl
2016 story: https://t.co/QV7Zf2snEP#EHTblackhole #EventHorizonTelescope pic.twitter.com/u6FBswmGDZ
— MIT CSAIL (@MIT_CSAIL) April 10, 2019
Writer Flora Graham tweeted a picture of Dr. Bouman side by side with a picture of Margaret Hamilton, the MIT computer scientist who helped write the software for the Apollo program.
Computer scientist Katie Bouman and her awesome stack of hard drives for #EHTblackhole image data 😍 — reminds me of Margaret Hamilton and her Apollo Guidance Computer source code. 👩🏽🔬 pic.twitter.com/MgOXiDCAKi
— Flora Graham (@floragraham) April 10, 2019
And @MIT_CSAIL sent a similar tweet, too.
Left: MIT computer scientist Katie Bouman w/stacks of hard drives of black hole image data.
Right: MIT computer scientist Margaret Hamilton w/the code she wrote that helped put a man on the moon.
(image credit @floragraham)#EHTblackhole #BlackHoleDay #BlackHole pic.twitter.com/Iv5PIc8IYd
— MIT CSAIL (@MIT_CSAIL) April 10, 2019
All of these tweets went viral. Just as so many people wanted to celebrate the brilliant young scientist for her achievement, many of them (mostly men) wanted to take her down for daring to somehow become the face of a project that involved the work of many.
Posts began to pop up disparaging Bouman on YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter.
Someone set up a fake Twitter account in Bouman’s name because that’s a thingtrolls love to do. But Dr. Bouman doesn’t even use Twitter, as someone pointed out in the comments, which is probably why she’s managed to get so much done in her life (right, that and that she’s probably a genius).
Katie Bouman on Twitter: "I don't have twitter". I guess that's how you get s*** done 😉
— Stefan Turalski (@StefanTuralski) April 11, 2019
Trolls found out the name of the primary developer on the project, Andrew Chael, and decided that he was the hero and that we should ignore Bouman.
People claimed that Chael had written over 850,000 lines of code for the program, information they’d gleaned from GitHub.
Speaking to The Washington Post, Chael explained, “It was clearly started by people who were upset that a woman had become the face of this story and decided, ‘I’m going to find someone who reflects my narrative instead.’”
Chael knew he had to step in and say something. “Once I realized that many online commentators were using my name and image to advance a sexist agenda to claim that Katie’s leading role in our global team was invented, I felt I should say something to make it clear I rejected that view,” Chael told CNN.
So Chael took to Twitter to set the record straight.
https://twitter.com/thisgreyspirit/status/1116518544961830918
(2/7) Our papers used three independent imaging software libraries (including one developed by my friend @sparse_k). While I wrote much of the code for one of these pipelines, Katie was a huge contributor to the software; it would have never worked without her contributions and
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
(3/7) the work of many others who wrote code, debugged, and figured out how to use the code on challenging EHT data. With a few others, Katie also developed the imaging framework that rigorously tested all three codes and shaped the entire paper (https://t.co/hgJrv3gOE5);
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
(4/7) as a result, this is probably the most vetted image in the history of radio interferometry. I’m thrilled Katie is getting recognition for her work and that she’s inspiring people as an example of women’s leadership in STEM. I’m also thrilled she’s pointing
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
(5/7) out that this was a team effort including contributions from many junior scientists, including many women junior scientists (https://t.co/Gte2sTNLXo). Together, we all make each other’s work better; the number of commits doesn’t tell the full story of who was indispensable.
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
(6/7) So while I appreciate the congratulations on a result that I worked hard on for years, if you are congratulating me because you have a sexist vendetta against Katie, please go away and reconsider your priorities in life. Otherwise, stick around — I hope to start tweeting
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
(7/7) more about black holes and other subjects I am passionate about — including space, being a gay astronomer, Ursula K. Le Guin, architecture, and musicals. Thanks for following me, and let me know if you have any questions about the EHT! ????????????️ pic.twitter.com/mCWbNhfySl
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
Chael wasn’t down with anyone bashing a woman’s contribution to the project when women are already so vastly underrepresented in STEM fields. He told CNN that as a gay man, he’s also part of a marginalized demographic.
Oh, and that thing about writing the 850,000 lines of code? Not even true.
(Also I did not write “850,000 lines of code” — many of those “lines” tracked by github are in model files. There are about 68,000 lines in the current software, and I don’t care how many of those I personally authored)
— Andrew Chael (@thisgreyspirit) April 12, 2019
People on Twitter were glad that Chael said something, but it sucks that it had to be a guy.
(2) Additionally, if a male made this accomplishment and made no mention of the team, fewer people would question this type of omission. Yet, when a woman makes the same accomplishment and gives credit to her team, her credibility and contribution gets called into question.
— Tina Yim (@Lilpandapaw) April 12, 2019
It also sucks that even after reading Chael’s tweets, some people remained unconvinced that Bouman was worthy of the attention she was getting.
Of course she deserves credit but spinning it into a female success story is forcing a narrative on a project that many other faces including yourself deserve just as much if not more credit for. Thank you for clarifying facts but I still believe you deserve recognition
— Triston Lee (@Triston_Bowman) April 12, 2019
And it also sucks that so much blame was heaped on Bouman, who never even came close to claiming she’d done it all herself.
Bouman told CNN, “No one of us could’ve done it alone. It came together because of lots of different people from many backgrounds.”
On her Facebook, Bouman posted a picture on April 10 of the entire team and wrote,
No one algorithm or person made this image, it required the amazing talent of a team of scientists from around the globe and years of hard work todevelop the instrument, data processing, imaging methods, and analysis techniques that were necessary to pull off this seemingly impossible feat. It has been truly an honor, and I am so lucky to have had the opportunity to work with you all.